Telecom & Computer Networks

Networks that reconfigure faster than they degrade.

Topology design, spectrum assignment, and edge task scheduling are graph and scheduling problems at a scale that punishes exhaustive search. We measure the difference on a live edge-computing workload, not a lab benchmark.

The problem

Topology, spectrum and scheduling — all graph-shaped.

Network build-out, frequency assignment, and edge task scheduling all reduce to variants of graph-colouring and combinatorial routing under conflict. As networks densify and traffic gets more dynamic, the gap between a workable configuration and the best one widens — and it widens fastest exactly where load is highest.

What we optimize

Three solutions, three archetypes.

Network Topology & Capacity Design

Optimal build-out and expansion of network graphs.

QG-GRAPH

Spectrum & Resource Allocation

Frequency and channel assignment — a graph-colouring problem.

QG-GRAPH

Traffic Routing & Edge Task Scheduling

Dynamic load balancing and MEC scheduling. 13.1% latency improvement demonstrated.

QG-ROUTEQG-SCHED

The engines behind it

Built on the mature engines.

Proof

A real result, not a projection.

13.1%Job-latency improvement — preliminary, 300-task MEC workload
300Tasks in the benchmarked scheduling workload

Preliminary until independently revalidated; methodology shared under NDA. QG-GRAPH's network-topology and spectrum-allocation work is research-stage — no published number for those yet.

Have a network to optimize?

Share topology, spectrum or scheduling data; we'll benchmark against your current approach and give you a clear read.

Request a pilot